Sent discovery request to Defendants legal counsel. This request will provide well documented ex-parte communication from Mr. Shipley to Defendant. Defendant doesn’t want to provide this. Therefore, a negotiation document was sent to Defendants Legal counsel. Then Plaintiff received a positive response. Defendant the dishonest and unethical and wayward judge will be removed by the US Supreme Court. An appeal was started and accepted in less than 8 hours. Normally this process takes 10 to 14 days. An opening Appeal Brief is written and will be filed by Monday June 16th 2025. at the same time an Extraordinary Writ of Certiorari by Rule 20 to the United States Federal Court the Ninth Circuit Federal Court case 3:25-CV-00501-AB. Petitioner is asking the US Supreme Court with well documented facts with clear and convincing evidence to remove wayward Judge Bailey and wayward Federal Judge Bagio. Also rule Judicial Immunity is a myth.
Judges dont have judicial immunity. This is article III section 1 which has been used to say Judges have immunity. The Supreme court has not ruled it yet. We may write an amicus brief and file in the US Supreme Court.
Article III Judicial Immunity from Suit
SECTION 1. The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.
The concept of judicial immunity derives from a string of spurious case law rulings, in the 19th Century such as Stump v. Sparkman, among others. These make no sense in light of Article III in the U.S. Constitution. Article III makes no mention of immunity – neither the word nor the concept – and all such case law is disqualified anyway by Justice Gorsuch’s Opinion in Loper Bright.
Moreover, if a judge is granted blanket immunity, why does the 9th Circuit Complaint form ask the question, “have you filed a lawsuit against the judge?” Clearly the 9th Circuit does in fact believe that wayward judges do not have such sweeping immunity or they would not have included this question. If Congress wants judicial immunity for judges, then they should pass a law.
Other rulings make no sense in light of Article III, which makes no mention of immunity. This has been determined by use of illegal case law. By Loper Bright the constitution is the highest authority.
The 9th circuit complaint forms asks if a lawsuit has been filed against the judge itself. Therefore judges dont have immunity. Much case law but its wrong.
Filed a DOJ complaint against Judge Bailey. Email sent to Attorneys for crooked Judge Bailey. Greetings Mr. Eliot Thompson, et al.
As you may now know, I served you on Saturday with the notice I filed in
my divorce case, demanding no magistrate Judge, and thus recusal
of the current judge. I did this given the reputation of the magistrate
judge for denying litigants of their Constitutional right to a fair
trial, as my ADA case against
the demonstrably unethical Judge Bailey is clearly demonstrating.
Incredibly this corrupt judge illegally nullified the federal 21-day
rule for default judgment, which is
a slap in the face for a disabled veteran under the Americans with
Disability Act.
If my legitimate demand is rejected, please know that you are wasting
more of the people’s valuable court time because I will not hesitate to
file a lawsuit for obstruction of justice to have this corrupt “public servant” removed
from the bench along with the equally corrupt Defendant, Judge Bailey.
As if to highlight the problem, on Friday the new Attorney General, Pam
Bondi arrested two federal judges for similar acts of defying federal
law in their personal capacity.
Clearly there is a new sheriff in town, when the AG stated, “This should
serve as a reality check. We could not believe that a judge actually
did that. The word deranged is all I can think of. I think some of these judges think
that they are beyond and above the law — and they are not! Both of
these cases should go to show that no one is beyond the law.”
Therefore, on Saturday morning I contacted the Federal Department of
Justice and filed a civil rights case against the Defendant, Judge
Bailey, whom I am suing in his personal capacity. I expect in a few days one or multiple
Federal DOJ Attorneys will register in the case. AJ Pam Bondi said
Friday “No One is Above the Law” She said it twice. If the
demonstrably corrupt Judge Bailey wants to save his bar license and
negotiate, now is the time to do it.
Filed on Friday April 25th rule 73 not consent to magistrate judge. The current federal Judge must recuse herself.
Complaint Almost ready to file in Federal Court Tuesday March 25 2025. Case number 3:25-CV-501-AB
In 21DR02783 and other cases dishonest and unethical, Judge Bailey failed to adjudicate 13 Felonies of Perjury and collusion which is a violation of 18 U.S. Code § 4 – Misprision of felony. Up to 3 years in federal prison for Crooked Judge Bailey. That case is now before the 9th circuit court of appeals where the appellees of my x-wife and her attorney and her witnesses committed the felonies. Four felonies are Perjury of the judge whom wrote the final ruling which was based on zero case facts and lied 4 times which is perjury. Crooked Judge Bailey knew all of this and dismissed every correct legal pleading I filed normally within 5 minutes of receiving them. Some of these documents were 40 or so pages long. In a fake contempt hearing where I split the grandchildren’s money by Oregon Supreme Court Staveland and Fisher and Crooked judge Bailey wouldn’t let me testify remotely. That is violation of Americans with disabilities act violations and Article 6 and 14 of the US Constitution, due process of law. Failing to properly adjudicate 13 Felonies is a violation of https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/4 18 U.S. Code § 4 – Misprision of felony Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 684; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
For example, on Friday, March 7th, 2025, Appellant filed the document in the Appendix in 21DR02783 for dishonest and unethical, Judge Bailey to sign. It was an innocuous request to remove the filings from an illegal lis Pendens that Appellee 4 had removed months earlier. But, true to form, dishonest and unethical, Judge Bailey dismissed it with illegal bias and illegal Administrative Law, just like literally every other reasonable pleading Appellant presented to him. On March 11th, 2025 Appellant took his walker and in great pain went to dishonest and unethical, Judge Baileys Chamber to ask what legal standing the Judge had to deny it. The clerk was very rude and refused to let Appellant talk to the Judge. I, the Appellant, told the clerk that another letter (this one) was being sent shipped and in which I would explain in detail how Judge Bailey in Washington County is corrupted by extreme bias to the point of total disregard of state and federal law. How are average Americans to respect the law if its esteemed guardians themselves have no respect for the law. As a consequence, next week, Appellant will file the two million dollar lawsuit in federal court against dishonest and unethical Judge Bailey and have it served to him. Appellant will then proceed to file a complaint with the 9th circuit court with that case number.
Judge Bailey’s extreme illegal bias and illegal administrative law and collusion are known to the 9th circuit court as Official Judicial Misconduct.
Sign Up to Testify
